By David Williams (thanks to Mary Montgomery)
Frequent Skyline presenter David Williams writes about the scams “offered” to bolster his book sales. Click here to read.
By David Williams (thanks to Mary Montgomery)
Frequent Skyline presenter David Williams writes about the scams “offered” to bolster his book sales. Click here to read.

A rufous-collared sparrow. The bird’s songs, some of which are no longer heard, have been recreated with a computer from annotations made in the 1960s. About 4,000 of the world’s 10,000 bird species are songbirds, such as finches, sparrows and blackbirds. Photograph: Martín Benchimol
When populations fall, fledglings can struggle to learn the right notes to attract mates. But research on how birds communicate offers hope for species’ surviv
Rebecca Ratcliffe in the Guardian (thanks to Charlotte Lin). Here’s the link if desired with a video documentary.
Listening to birdsong is one of life’s great joys, but when researchers heard a particular tune emerging from a tree in a Buenos Aires park, they were especially jubilant. This arrangement was among those chirped by the local rufous-collared sparrows in the 1960s, but had since disappeared from the area.
That was until scientists created a computer-generated rendition, curious to find out if birds might consider it realistic enough to imitate. Less than three months later, a local avian resident began to copy parts of the song.
There is a growing recognition of birdsong’s importance to conservation, and of the need to better understand how birds learn to sing. If an individual sings well, and in a familiar “dialect”, they are better placed to find a mate, defend their territory and ultimately survive.
If a species’ population declines, however, there are fewer opportunities for fledglings to become good singers. Birds can begin to tweet abnormally or mistakenly learn the songs of other species, jeopardising their chances of breeding.
Male birds are in a better position to attract a mate if they can sing well – which, broadly speaking, means their song is complex, sung consistently and well performed. “If your song requires a lot of energy you might have to be in quite a good condition to sing it,” says Rebecca Lewis, a conservation scientist at Chester Zoo.
“When people talk about biodiversity, we’re always talking about genes, about genetic material,” says Gabriel B Mindlin, professor of physics at the University of Buenos Aires, who co-authored the study on rufous-collared sparrows, and whose work is featured in a Guardian-produced documentary, Dream of Birds.
But animals’ learned behaviour or culture, such as birdsong, is also an essential part of their population, says Mindlin.

The rufous-collared sparrow is not considered vulnerable globally, but researchers hope that synthetic recordings could help teach birdsong to other species whose populations are dwindling, allowing conservationists to tutor individuals where real-life recordings do not exist.
About 4,000 of the world’s 10,000 bird species are songbirds (or oscine passerines), such as finches, sparrows and blackbirds, which generally have complex songs that are at least partly learned from other individuals. Their songs are hugely diverse, though separate research on the wider group of passerine group of birds, which incorporates songbirds, has identified common “motifs” or building blocks: three types of trill, three types of whistle, chaotic notes and harmonic notes.
The way that birds use these motifs reflects the environment in which the birds evolved. Flat whistles are more likely to be sung by birds in tropical rainforests where sound must travel through dense vegetation. Complex motifs, such as ultrafast trills, are more common in temperate regions where birds tend to communicate at closer range.

The song studied by Mindlin was recreated based on hand-drawn annotations of rufous-collared sparrow songs that were made in the 1960s. Each song consists of a trill, which is consistent among individuals in the same region, and a theme, which varies. Some of the themes recorded decades ago are still sung by the local birds, but others have died out.
It is not clear why the song studied by Mindlin had disappeared, though he notes the population of birds in the park had declined.
Birds’ songs can change naturally over time – for example, birds might make errors when learning songs, which then can become imprinted in future renditions. Human encroachment and population declines can also cause dramatic changes.
Songbirds learn from other members of their species – such as a father or neighbours – which results in local groups developing their own dialects. The window for learning varies from a few weeks to a lifetime. Some species also have an innate level of knowledge.

“There’s such a diversity in songbirds in how they learn,” says Sarah Collins, associate professor of animal behaviour at the University of Plymouth, who studied a group of cirl buntings that were translocated from Devon to Cornwall as part of a conservation project.
Initially, the birds produced abnormal songs that were squeaky and slow, and far less diverse than those of the source populations in Devon. “They didn’t have the richness of sound,” says Collins. Eight years later, however, their songs had returned to normal.
A few of the chicks were played recordings of cirl sounds, though not all. The study suggests that recovery of song is possible, though it is unclear if other species would bounce back in the same way. Cirl buntings are born with knowledge of the elements that make up the “notes” used in their songs, says Collins. “What they learn is how to put those elements together,” she says.
Some songbird species have a similar genetic underpinning and so may also be able to recover their songs, but others do not. Either way, Collins recommends a tutor to help other birds that are being translocated.
A separate study in Australia tracked regent honeyeaters that were bred in zoos to boost a critically endangered wild population that had fallen to about 250 individuals. Interacting with just two wild-born male “tutors” helped the zoo-bred birds to learn to sing the wild songs. Thereafter, zoo-bred males that had learned the traditional songs went on to tutor the next generation.

“Sometimes birds don’t learn very well from CDs or just playbacks. They need some sort of interaction,” says Collins.
Bringing wild birds into captivity to teach hand-reared chicks could cause huge distress and bring disease, however, risking the health of individuals from an already endangered population. It is possible that AI could help provide live tutoring in the future.

Dialect is also important. Past translocation projects have shown that birds are slower to match if they do not sing in the same dialect. “Birds with mismatched songs don’t pair quite as quickly or do quite as well once they’re paired,” adds Lewis. Familiarising birds with songs of their destination can help to mitigate this.
A huge volume of birdsong is now being recorded and uploaded into databases, including by a growing number of hobbyists interested in birdwatching, says Mindlin. “One day we’ll be grateful to have all those records,” he says. “I don’t think we still have an idea that really we have to register dialects and communication systematically.”
In Buenos Aires, the song from the 1960s can still be heard. “It’s still being sung by just a few individuals, pretty close to where we inserted it,” he says, though only time will tell how long it persists.
Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reporters Rebecca Ratcliffe, Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield in the Guardian app for more nature coverage.
Thanks to Linda Turner
1. NEXT NO KINGS MARCH: On Saturday, Oct. 17, there will be a nationwide march to support early voting. ***(See below for organizers’ statement)
—12:30 pm : Seniors at the Crossroads will gather at 12:30 on 8th & Madison before the NO KINGS March that begins at 2pm
—2 pm : “VOTE EARLY” MARCH AND VOTING FAIR
A nonpartisan march and voting fair to support free and fair elections, early voting, and to protect/defend our vote by mail
—Time – Saturday, Oct 17, 2-5pm
STARTING LOCATION – Westlake Park, 401 Pine St.
ENDING LOCATION/VOTING FAIR- Seattle Center
2. NEXT SENIORS AT THE CROSSROADS DEMONSTRATION
Thursday, October 22 , is the last Crossroads gathering before the election. To avoid walking when it’s dark, we will meet from 3:30 – 4:30 at 8th and Madison. Signs encouraging early voting would be great.
Linda Turner
For the Seniors at the Crossroads Steering Committee
**************************************************************
***ABOUT THIS EVENT–ORGANIZERS’ STATEMENT
March joyfully through Seattle to a Voting Fair at Seattle Center
We March for Free and Fair Elections, and to Protect/Defend our Vote by Mail
Power belongs to the people and elections belong to the states, NOT to kings, billionaires, or politicians who believe they are above the people and the law.
On Oct 17th we are turning people power into voting power. Our community is coming together to celebrate voting, to make a plan to vote early, and to ensure that every eligible voter has the opportunity to cast their ballot.
No Kings: Vote Early events are nonpartisan and are designed to increase participation from all eligible voters.
Coalition Partners: Seattle Indivisible, West Seattle Indivisible, SE Seattle Indivisible, North Seattle Progressives, Evergreen Resistance, Troublemakers, Defund Musk
A core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events.
From the Borowitz Report (Thanks to Pam Peterson)

In January 2025, Ann Telnaes, the Pulitzer-winning cartoonist for the Washington Post, announced that she was quitting the paper where she’d worked since 2008. She did so after her editor killed her (now famous) cartoon depicting WaPo owner Jeff Bezos and other craven billionaires debasing themselves before Donald J. Trump—an act of censorship intended, she wrote, “to get in the good graces of an autocrat-in-waiting.”
Since then, the indomitable Telnaes has gone on to roaring success on Substack, attracting an enormous audience and picking up her second Pulitzer. But for other cartoonists, prospects have never seemed more dire.
Censorship has undermined the opinion pages of newspapers across the US during Trump’s second term. Two weeks after Telnaes resigned, a small newspaper in Pennsylvania outdid the Post in gutlessness. When an anti-Trump cartoon in the Latrobe Bulletin drew the ire of pro-Trump readers, the publisher, Dave Cuddihy, announced that he was banning all political cartoons forever.
“While political cartoons have run in newspapers, including the Latrobe Bulletin, for many years; this is a final example of how we feel they have run their course,” he wrote, showing a brazen disregard for both the First Amendment and how to use a semicolon.
In 2026, the news for cartoonists has, improbably, gotten even worse. Last month, Air Mail, a newsletter that had published cartoons for seven years, suddenly stopped buying them. And last week, Nieman Lab revealed that OpenAI’s ChatGPT has been producing counterfeit New Yorker-style cartoons—complete with the unauthorized signatures of real New Yorker cartoonists.
It’s worth noting that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, one of the toadying oligarchs immortalized in Telnaes’s banned cartoon, donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund. To my knowledge, he hasn’t offered a nickel to the cartoonists whose work he’s plundered. And the fake New Yorker cartoons are part of a malign trend: newspapers that have eliminated controversial cartoons by pesky humans are replacing them with AI slop.
This existential threat to cartoonists should alarm any fan of that quaint constitutional right called freedom of expression. Here’s what Ann Telnaes said when I interviewed her shortly after her departure from the Post: “[S]upport your local or your favorite editorial cartoonist… I just want people to realize that you have to support and protect other people’s right to say what they want to say and how they want to say it in order for you to keep yours.”
Ann’s advice stayed with me. And so, when I learned that Air Mail was depriving cartoonists of one of their last remaining markets, I decided to start buying cartoons for publication on TBR.
This shouldn’t be mistaken for some grand altruistic gesture. It’s good business. Contrary to what that bonehead at the Latrobe Bulletin says, people love cartoons. Since TBR started publishing them, the response from readers has been spectacular. What’s more, I’ve started receiving submissions from some of the most acclaimed cartoonists in America. I’m awed by their talent, and I can’t wait to share their work with you.
One final thing. Adding cartoons to TBR would never have been possible without the generous support of my subscribers—and for that you have my deepest gratitude and love. As I’ve said many times, you’re the reason I do what I do.
from the New York Times (thanks to Charlotte Lin)
New York Times reporters have fanned out across the country, chronicling the highest-profile Senate contests that will decide who controls the chamber and the tiny municipal disputes about data centers. Five of them to answer your queries.
Why are candidates allowed to air ads that lie about their opponents? | Dawn Seggelink | Medford, Oregon
Courts give political speech the highest level of First Amendment protection. Candidates and PACs can be sued for defamation if they air damaging claims that they knew were false, or if they “acted with reckless disregard” of the truth. But the bar to win such a case is extremely high, and courts move slowly. More important, candidates don’t have to lie outright to fudge the truth. There is a well-established playbook for that, including by omitting context, airing unproven allegations and drawing misleading conclusions about unrelated facts. — Bayliss Wagner, who covers politics
Have pollsters made changes to get more accurate results? | Howard Frysinger | Glenmoore, Pennsylvania (continued on Page 2)
Today, Tuesday October 13th 2:30 PM in the Mt. Baker Room
Seattle Documentary “Speaking of Dying” – Trudy James
Discussion and Q&A with 3 physicians – Kate Brostoff, Bob Wood and Jim deMaine
Thanks to Charlotte Lin
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03210-z
A group of nanoscientists has developed tattoo inks that become visible only under ultraviolet light, and can be hidden again using bright visible light. The inks are made from tiny spheres of acrylic glass that contain photochromes — compounds that undergo a reversible colour change on exposure to a specific wavelength of light. The products could be used in medical tattooing, such as markers to direct radiotherapy to specific parts of the body.
Thanks to Pam Peterson. Click here to read the story.


David Remnick, Editor, The New Yorker (thanks to Charlotte Lin)
Signs of a midterm blue wave are everywhere, and yet it would be journalistic malpractice not to attach some nervous caveats to any prediction. Polls are sketchy. Campaigns have never been more subject to the desires of the wealthy. What is more, the President of the United States has the impulse control of a toddler, though most toddlers have neither the authority nor the inclination to spark an insurrection, destabilize the Western alliance, live-stream an execution, or threaten to end “a whole civilization.” We are subjected daily to the caprices of a mind both unregulated and amoral. As Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said, the Commander-in-Chief is “fascist to the core.” You may prefer milder terminology. Fine. But, after a decade defined by Donald Trump’s unceasing presence, a growing percentage of the American electorate appears to recognize the uniqueness of this President and the mayhem that he has instigated from the Oval Office.
We are, collectively, on guard against undue optimism. Still, if the coming election does result in a blue wave, Trump will be faced with the fact of his diminishment. The rest of us will be faced with the wreckage.
A decade ago, those who believed that Trump’s ascent represented a grave and multifaceted danger, a national emergency, were often met with sneering dismissal. The right generally regarded Trump’s most vocal opponents as pussy-hatted snowflakes, woke snobs indifferent to the struggles of working people. They were, in a word, “deranged.” Some on the left, too, insisted that those who thought of Trump as aberrant and sought nightly salvation in a tankard of Chardonnay and “The Rachel Maddow Show” ignored America’s complicated legacy. Was Trump really so much worse than his predecessors? Hardly! In fact, he was practically mainstream, “not some strange eddy in the current of American history,” one knowing essayist wrote in The New Republic. “He is where the ordinary river flowed.” All that distinguished Trump was “aesthetics”—“He is vulgar. He is rude.” (continued on Page 2)
Thanks to Rick Baugh
Ed note: Some monitoring may help, but we need to be careful about medicalizing our lives, constantly knowing of our heart beats, mood, night’s sleep, etc. Perhaps we’ll need to check our wearables to see if we’re still alive!
View in browser![]() ![]() The Role of Data from Wearable Technologies in Improving Timely Diagnosis. Join us for a public discussion exploring how health data collected through wearable technologies may support timely and accurate diagnosis. The webinar will be held on October 26, 2026 from 1:00 – 2:30 PM (ET). Register now Wearable technologies increasingly allow patients and consumers to collect physiological, behavioral, and other health data outside traditional clinical settings. This webinar, hosted by the Forum on Advancing Diagnostic Excellence, will consider the role of data from wearables in supporting timely and accurate diagnosis. Participants will discuss the potential role of wearables in earlier detection, clinical assessment, and symptom monitoring, as well as opportunities to strengthen patient-clinician communication and shared diagnostic decision-making. The discussion will also address challenges faced by patients, clinicians, and health systems in interpreting and incorporating wearable- |

By Kwame Anthony Appiah (thanks to Tim Barrick)
Kwame Anthony Appiah has been The New York Times Magazine’s Ethicist columnist since 2015 and teaches philosophy at N.Y.U.
My 93-year-old father moved into assisted living this past January after my mother died. He requires round-the-clock personal care, which his income fortunately allows us to provide. My sister and I manage his caregivers through an agency that has been excellent. For the past four years, it has sent us good people who are paid fairly. We also give generous holiday bonuses, which are scaled to reflect how long each caregiver has worked for us, the longest being four years.
Recently, one caregiver, who joined the team late last year, texted to ask whether we would “sponsor” him for an advanced course that would help him further his career in health care. This caregiver has been excellent and is often available when others are sick or on vacation. The cost of the course is just under $3,000, and we could certainly afford it.
I wonder, however, about whether giving him money for the course would be fair to the other caregivers. I also suspect that making such a request violates agency policy, and we don’t want to alert the agency, because we fear he could be dismissed.
Our initial thought was to offer half the amount and ask him to consider it an early holiday bonus. My father does not have dementia, but Parkinson’s disease has left him quite apathetic and depressed, and he is not really in a position to weigh in. — Name Withheld (continued on Page 2)
Submitted by Pam Peterson
Submitted by Bob Peterson
Submitted by Charlotte Lin
Submitted by Pam Peterson
Submitted by Bob Peterson
Last evening on the PBS Newshour, there was an emotional discussion between two fathers who had devasting losses related to the October 7th killings. They pose an answer to a universal question: Can we love our enemies? Below is a discussion on ABC Australia.
Thanks to Charlotte Lin
Stowaway https://stowaway.live/ shows you all the aircraft flying over your location right now and allows you to “ride along” and look out the window at the sky, stars and earth below. I’ve ridden along on a few passenger jets, as well as a high-altitude balloon at 68,000 feet and the biggest plane in the U.S. Air Force inventory (we cruised over the Sacramento Valley).
thanks to my friend John Roper
Last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made headlines by offering this vision of the military: “No fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals.” Inspired by this wisdom, we’ve compiled our own list of people who should be banned from government.
Subscribe here for more Unfit to Serve Ann Telnaes |
Open Windows- Ann Telnaes is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Thanks Ken and Peter – from the New York Times Tiny Love Stories
Sometimes we wonder how long our love can last — when I use a PC, and Ken uses a Mac. He says, “Command.” I say, “Control.” Neither of us obeys. He sends me documents in Pages; I respond using Word, hoping for the best. I have an Android. Ken holsters an iPhone. When my texts turn green and emojis don’t translate, he pretends not to notice. Yet somehow we share Wi-Fi, printers, passwords — and a life. Perhaps this is what a true marriage is like: different systems, same network and someone with whom you love to troubleshoot and reboot. — Peter Pereira

Thanks to Charlotte Lin
In-space manufacturing startup Varda Space told Reuters it has raised $250 million in a Series D round at a $1.6 billion valuation, part of its mission to produce pharmaceuticals in microgravity.

There are certain products whose development in space yields better efficiencies or purities than in the gravity of Earth.
Varda has already deployed six missions to orbit. These were undertaken with its free-flying W-Series capsule. It plans to debut a next-generation capsule in 2030.
From historian Heather Cox’s Letter From An American
Judging from his social media posts, Trump is panicking.
Shortly after noon yesterday, he posted that it was “no longer the Strait of Hormuz” driving up gasoline prices, but Ukraine’s strikes on Russia’s refineries. In fact, some oil tankers have indeed been passing through the strait but, as Spencer Kimball of CNBC explains, “only due to a major U.S. military commitment and at a high cost to the lives of tanker crews.” That policy was already too expensive to sustain, and now increased strikes from Iran are threatening it altogether.
Then, clearly incensed at reports that people are not turning out for his rallies, he posted pictures to prove the arenas were full, but those pictures were carefully cropped to avoid the empty upper decks shown in news photographs. “I never have empty seats—Never have, and never will!” he posted. “The Rallies are “HOTTER” than ever.” He added: “The New York Times, and many other Artificial Media Outlets, should be arrested for their dishonesty and disservice to our Country.”
Then he accused the New York Times of doctoring a picture of his Miami club, Trump National Doral, where he has announced he will hold this year’s Group of 20 (G20) summit of leaders from the world’s major advanced and emerging economies this December. His attempt to hold the G7 there in 2019 created an uproar even from Republicans about the blatant self-dealing.
There is less uproar now, leaving Trump free to complain that the New York Times “is a CROOKED outfit that caters to Lunatics who want to see our Country fail” and to warn that “Some day in the not too distant future The Times will be forced to close its dirty doors, and that will be a Great Day for America!” Next to the New York Times image that showed a dirty, yellowed building looking out at the elbows, Trump posted one showing it gleaming white with immaculate gardens. (Continued on Page 2)